Company / Finland

TrustCore AI Systems Oy.
Engineering the right to act.

A Finnish AI infrastructure company developing runtime governance, controlled execution and evidence before consequence.

Our focus

The transition from
recommendation to action.

As AI systems gain access to tools and workflows, they need more than good instructions. They need explicit authority, bounded scope and a meaningful opportunity to refuse before an external effect.

TrustCore develops control patterns and technical infrastructure for that boundary. The focus is practical: evaluate a narrow workflow, make decisions inspectable and connect claims to evidence.

Our working principles are identity-bound authorization, policy-bound routing, fail-closed enforcement and human final gates for high-consequence actions.

Legal name
TrustCore AI Systems Oy
Business ID / Y-tunnus
3618251-2
Country
Finland
Founder & AI Architect
Kari “Gary” Hyötylä
Business & partnerships
kari.hyotyla@trustcore.fi
Phone
+358 41 711 1611
Security reports
security@trustcore.fi

Founder

Kari “Gary” Hyötylä

Founder & AI Architect

A hands-on systems builder working across hardware, software and AI. TrustCore grows out of a practical question: how do we keep authority and control explicit as systems become more capable?

Gary is also the author of Governance Before Decision, a field guide exploring proof, permission and human-controlled AI execution.

Connect with Kari on LinkedIn

Development tracks

One company. Focused lines of work.

Final Gate, governed remediation and FlowRouter are presented as scoped development and pilot tracks. GhostRouter remains a related project in development. Technical details are shared only within an agreed scope.

Governance Before Decision cover

The thinking behind the boundary

Governance Before Decision

A field guide preview for proof, permission and human-controlled AI execution. Explore the questions an organization needs to answer before AI-generated work becomes action.

English · PDF · no registration

Start with one workflow

Where does AI output become action?

Define the action, name the authority and agree what evidence would demonstrate control.

Discuss a pilot